L. Brooks Patterson Ticketed for Not Wearing His Seatbelt in August Crash
The Oakland County executive paid the $65 ticket Tuesday.
Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson was cited Tuesday for not wearing a seatbelt in the Aug. 10 crash that hospitalized him for five weeks.
The Auburn Hills Police Department issued the ticket, which is a civil infraction with a maximum fine of $65 and zero points on a driving record. Patterson paid the fine on Tuesday.
“Not wearing a seatbelt was a mistake,” Patterson said in a statement. “I accept my responsibility and paid the $65 fine this afternoon.”
Patterson was discharged from McLaren Oakland Hospital in Pontiac on Friday and is continuing his rehabilitation at an undisclosed location.
He had been hospitalized since Aug. 10 when the car he was riding in crashed into another car at an Auburn Hills intersection. According to police reports, the second car failed to yield at a flashing yellow turn signal, causing the crash.
Patterson broke a hip, leg, ankle, five ribs and both wrists.
Patterson's car was driven by his longtime driver, James Cram. Neither Cram nor Patterson were wearing seatbelts when the cars crashed; Patterson's seatbelt was found buckled behind the passenger seat.
According to the Auburn Hills Police Department, Cram has not yet been issued a citation related to seatbelt use. "Mr. Cram suffered significant injuries from the crash and is not in a position to handle a traffic citation at this time," a news release stated.
Anthony Prainito, the driver of the Volkswagen Passat that Patterson's Chrysler 300 crashed into at the intersection of Walton and Opdyke, was charged with a misdemeanor in the crash. He pleaded not guilty.
More on the Patterson crash:
KB
2:52 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Yes, he deserved the ticket. He should have known better, especially in light of losing his son from a vehicular accident. He should be well aware of the deadly impact that can occur when one is not restrained while traveling at an accelerated speed in any vehicle.
That said, I am sorry he suffered the injuries he suffered, but it could have been much worse. I'm glad he's recovering well.
Haulin T Male
10:37 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Kris, Brook Jr. was killed on a snowmobile, on a large Lake, I believe he was broad sided,(?) if you call a Snowmobile a vehicle, I don't, it can not be driven on a road in Oakland county, as in most counties. no more then a riding lawn mower is a vehicle.
KB
7:41 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
@Haulin -- according to Merriam-Webster, the definition of SNOWMOBILE is as follows:
: any of various automotive vehicles for travel on snow; specifically : an open vehicle for usually one or two persons with steerable skis on the front and an endless belt at the rear
That said, what point are you trying to make?
Haulin T Male
8:35 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
My point, one) we now need Stop signs and traffic lights out on a huge frozen body of water Two) it is obvious that Merr-web, didn't no where to put it, so they described it, nothing more, Perhaps best would be off road, ride able pc. of machinery, as is a ride able lawn mower......... to your point in using a dictionary, to run your life...... your letting some else to do your common sense thinking.
KB
11:01 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
I'm not following your logic or the point you're trying to make, Haulin. My use of a dictionary was to educate you on the fact that a snowmobile is, in fact, a vehicle. Regardless of your focus on semantics, MY point was that Brooks should be well aware of the risk of traveling at accelerated speeds without restraint, regardless of the vehicle. He of all people should know better. Have a great day, Haulin.
Haulin T Male
7:09 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Going to edicate me, (lol) why I am just a bungling idiot, MOST words get into a dictionary by public usage, acceptance.
Kris, go into any dealer tell them you want to buy one of their Vehicles, don't slap them for their queried look.
Go into any large parking lot with 90 to 120 "Vehicles" parked out side, and ask the hostess if she could get some of the vehicles moved out side..... so you can park your VEHICLE , see what expression you get back at you......... they are sleds
SLEDS w / engines, they pay a TRAIL FEE, that is how those in the know will call them ............
'As for the book you quote, that is the same book that at one time, called a "fart" an explosion between the legs.............. go figure. "enough" ...... your not a snowmobiler. every one that is or sells, or repairs, call them sleds.....
Kristin Bull
7:12 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
It's unfortunate this thread has gotten completely off-topic. The story is related to L. Brooks Patterson paying a ticket for not wearing his seatbelt in a car crash; it's not about the tragic death of his son in a snowmobile accident.
Corrie
2:54 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
He should have been ticketed. I would have been ticketed if I had been in the same situation. As a role model in the community, it was a disappointment to hear that he wasn't wearing his seatbelt to begin with. Too many people have lost their lives in accidents this way. Thank goodness his body can heal.
Robb
2:55 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
He is lucky the insurance company doesn't refuse to pay for the cost of his hospitalization for not wearing his seat belt
Haulin T Male
10:36 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
No Fault, means just that ......... Robb
Ferndale_1986
1:07 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I'm assuming his benefit package includes health insurance, so we are probably paying to put him back together.
Cathy Fucinari
1:48 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Sorry, Haulin T Male, but no fault means the other guy won't have to pay for it.
Haulin T Male
9:16 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Cathy: the guy who hit them got a ticket, for basically causing the accident, (turning in front of on coming traffic) if car one didn't hit County car, there would of been no injury....... I think no fault comes into play when no ticket is given,
In Michigan, No seat belt, is just a fine, AND means NO points on your record. (it is a reminder Ticket, (should be invasion of privacy, when your stopped for no belt.
Tim Riley
2:57 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Great news lol. Now I can go back to my life and not worry about a man not wearing a seatbelt
Ron Dwyer
2:58 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Politicians should be treated the same as anyone else. Remember they are OUR EMPLOYEES. Now pertaining to wearing seat belts, they should not be mandatory. However, you also can't blame another driver for the severity of your injuries, if you choose not to take the proper precautions to minimize risk to yourself.
Judy Borchardt
2:58 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
My guess from viewing the pictures of the damage is that Patterson's driver was traveling pretty fast, maybe exceeding the speed limit?
John McMillin
5:49 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Fortunately cars have crumble areas that are made to help absorb the impact of a collision. I hit a street sign once trying to avoid a deer on icy road and at less than 20 mph had over three thousand dollars damage to the front end due to the crumble area on my vehicle. By the way I was wearing a seat belt.
Haulin T Male
10:36 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
John you are totally right, what looks like a mess now adays, would not of been back in the 50's thru 70's the crush zone is there.
micheal w smith
3:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I'm sure Mr. Patterson is learning a painful lesson by not wearing his seatbelt. Instead of the fine, I'd like him to serve community time where he explains to kids at least, the value of wearing their seatbelt.
LopeintheD
3:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
He's notoriously sat upon a pedestal above the law. I'm glad to see him treated as everyone else and set an example to those in the community who DO NOT use the safety restraint that is in all vehicles for a purpose...Silly man!
Gary Busch
3:04 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
I hope all of these men fully recover from their injuries. I hope this is a wake-up call for all of us who don't wear out seat belts, text on phones and other distracting things while driving.
Kristin Bull
3:21 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
We've updated the story to reflect the fact that Patterson paid the $65 ticket today.
Trees
4:24 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Good. How about a speeding ticket too? What about his driver - was he ticketed too?
Haulin T Male
10:36 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
How do you know he was speeding? cause some scribe said the "black Box" so tell me how accurate is the "black Box" when was it last calibrated, way back when it was built? what happens to it when it goes down the wash board roads of No. Oakland Co.? I do court watching, they are ok for telling the Tech'y why or what......... but in a court of law, not so reliable. as for L B's ticket, my sources (inside) said he let it be known the ticket, was to be written..... see he is a politician,
Joseph McCauley
4:53 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
It's called adding insult to injury. Of course, he brought this on himself by not wearing his seatbelt. Perhaps his injuries wouldn't have been so bad too.
Debbie
6:41 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
My thoughts and prayers are with all involved for a speedy recovery. This was a horrible accident. It's a shame that some were not wearing their seat belts and therefore received such horrific injuries. Both cars were very mangled. Just how fast was Patterson's driver going to cause such damage? We all need to learn to wear out seat belts and drive the speed limit.
Grover
10:26 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
L.Brooks car was going 54 mph 1 second before impact. The speed limit was 45 mph. The other car was turning left on a flashing yellow. The auburn hills chief of police was quick to blame the driver turning left, who could have thought there was time to make the turn had the oncoming car not been speeding. My guess is the l.Brooks cars brakes were locked up because it was going a lot faster than 54 mph 5 seconds before crash.
nosolution
1:07 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
How did you get exact facts? If they are true - then the driver of Brooks car needs a speeding ticket.
JohnKimble
1:07 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
the article I read indicated 1/10th of a second prior to impact. the data logging that the OEM's put in their cars is pretty impressive, and I highly doubt the professional law enforcement officers would omit relevant data about grossly excessive speeds in the immediately preceding moments as they will come out as evidence in court.
I suspect that unfortunately, Mr. Patterson's driver may have never even got his foot onto the brakes...
Regardless, 5 seconds is an eternity in terms of reaction time and vehicle dynamics. at 54 mph one covers ground at a rate of just under 80 feet per second. a typical lane of paved road way is 11ish feet wide. that means they effectively crossed through an entire 5 lane intersection in less than 1/2 second if they had been at a constant speed.
someone also apparently drives an ancient vehicle, probably on bias ply tires without a seat belt if they think a brand new Chrysler had brakes "locked up for 5 seconds" (in most automotive tests the 300's deceleration from 60 mph to zero is accomplished in 120 feet or so)
I survived a similar t-bone accident when someone turned left in front of me in a posted 50 mph zone (no traffic lights they were just not paying attention as my car as well as the ones above have day time running lights). my injuries were limited to minor airbag burns on my forearms, and a hairline crack in a knuckle when one of my hands flew off of the steeringwheel and smashed out an HVAC Vent.
Kat Freemason
7:17 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
Or, put another way, Grover, ...a lot faster 2 seconds before the crash. What drugs/alcohol were in the Deputy's and Brook's systems? Oh, forgot, they weren't drug tested. How convenient, per usual. Another fact in this case is that the Auburn Hills judge who ticketed the other driver was convicted of a DUI, was on a tether for a year, but was still allowed to be a judge during that year!!! How did that happen? Thanks to Brooks, she still kept her job. This incident stinks to high heaven.
Kat Freemason
7:17 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
Retired Deputy and Patterson speeding, and not wearing seat belts causing severe injuries. Sheriff Bouchard nose diving his helicopter into a crowd of peaceful classic car owners during the Dream Cruise sending people to the hospital.
WE NEED A HUGE CHANGE IN OAKLAND COUNTY. PRONTO.
Linda P
10:37 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
While many are critiquing Brooks for his absent seat belt.......his accident and injuries as a result have been a high profile reminder to me. More than a few times I have driven off buckling my belt "on the way". I really think so much good from this incident regarding seat belt use will emerge that criticism of Brooks will end up being fortuitous. Return to work soon Mr. Patterson you have been a great leader for Oakland County and we need you back and soon.
Beth Ayers
1:07 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
This action brings some integrity back to Oakland County politics, I am proud to see the police department acting appropriately and Mr. Patterson taking responsibility. It's just the right thing to do.
Haulin T Male
8:35 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
@ beth, not sure the integrity of Politics in Oak Co. is based on a Seat Belt Ticket, as a politician, he is using this to it's fullest....... what a good bad guy am I.
Linda Andersen
1:07 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
he was wrong, he was ticketed, he paid the fine...he and Mr. Cram continue to pay thru their injuries... enough said. I wish them both a complete recovery.
Ivy
1:53 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I can understand someone forgetting to buckle up, but to latch the belt behind the seat is strange. I think everyone should think about Brooks behavior when voting. I just wish this incident occurred before the primary.
JohnKimble
4:06 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
it is everyone's individual right to protest a law, and even practice civil disobedience provided one is willing to accept responsibility/penalty for same.
I personally find it strange, even reprehensible that someone would wish for a horrific accident to happen prior to political outcome, rather than to simply wish it hadn't happened at all...
Kat Freemason
7:17 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
Which brings up an interesting question....how is it he is even a valid choice on this year's ballot? He is currently disabled from working as County Executive, and is receiving disability insurance. Is he still being paid wages while on disability? If so, that is fraud. With all the empty/closed businesses in Oakland County, and astronomical increase in food stamp recipients over the last few years, we can't afford Patterson (or Bouchard for that matter). The only thing keeping Oakland County above the fray are the taxpayers of Bloomfield Hills. The rest of the County is in very poor shape.
Mackey Chandler
1:53 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
I'm satisfied he made a gesture that says he is bound by law like the rest of us. There are not any shades of gray on this. We are either a nation with a rule of law or ruled by personalities and naked power. I think it was a very smart move politically. Showing he could thumb his nose at it would have left hundreds of people who would never forget or forgive such a seemingly minor act.
JAMES H. DOUGLAS
2:55 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
No sympathy here. He said he takes responsibility and deserves a ticket. He hasn't begun to accept responsibility. Sixty-five bucks.... big deal. The paperwork generated from writing the ticket will cost the taxpayers more than $65. How about showing the taxpayers he is accepting responsibility and will reimburse the insurance companies for his negligence? How will the insurance companies recover their losses? By increasing the cost of their premiums. Who pays the premiums for his insurance? The taxpayers.
One would think he learned a lesson when he didn't get the DUI he deserved several years ago. Apparently not. .
Homer Simpson
7:59 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Again...Michigan is a No-Fault state.
Kat Freemason
10:18 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012
"...the DUI?" You must mean the several hundred DUI and other illegal substance abuse charges he should have gotten over the last 20 years.
Sefasdancer44
7:36 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
That's right James. The DUI he deserved several years ago still upsets me. If it was you or I in that situation we would have been locked up and still making payments to pay off the repercussions. Depends who you are as always!!!!
Haulin T Male
9:51 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Dancer44, that is so not true, I will tell you, a certain PD, stop me, I was goinf down, after two beers, I didn't know what was happening, I couldn't get zyxw....... they ran my record found spotless, his partner drove my van and parked it across the street, and they drove me home....... I have not had a beer since......... that was 4 yr's ago. This makes it sound as though I drink and drive, What was happening, I was having a reaction to new medicine that did not say "no alcohol " They had noticed I was wearing Compression leg wraps, ask if I was on any medicine, ............... yep.......
so don't say if it was you or I, It was "I" I am thank full it was raining, and the motorcycle department doubled up with scout cars............ I sent them a thank you card, and their observation and deed, will always be remembered......... as for Patterson, when you see him talk at length it is more on the jovial and happy side, (mannerisms) easy to get confused............ I had a guy at work who had umpteen court appearances, he was from Denmark, he talked very broken English, the case would get thrown out, cause he acted and talked as if drunk....... so to give an "I know what happen" statement should be careful . Do you or I really know?..
R Jeppostol
8:24 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Make no mistake, L. Brooks is still above the law.
Sefasdancer44
1:09 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Haulin T Male are you a relative of Patterson or something?
Haulin T Male
8:37 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I am not, but old enough to realize the county is better off with him then not.. I did not vote for him !
I am a frustrated def. atty. wanna be, if I could do over. smile. the law is fasc.
There fore when ppl with grudges don't like titles, etc speak out on Half truths to muddy the waters.
as for "Glass Bottle" means what. to you your implying a no no. But to me it means it could be a sport drink, one of those Tea's that are not in the tall cans, why it could even be an Italian Sauce, or pickle pigs feet.. and or any thing else in a glass bottle.
as for the reports, for all the time they close down a rd. for invest. the public reports are sure lacking, I agree, I see my cpd reports monthly, hard to make sense of them. I think (know) it is to not make public too much.. till action is taken, or freedom of info is filed.
It just be nice if ppl would not pass wind on their anxieties but just on the facts........ ever been on a jury, DNA is as close to perfect as one could get, YET it is not 100% , if there is doubt must not convict.. why is the guy contesting ? does he have 10 points> I don't know. but if he calls the driver or Patterson to the stand they can plied the 5th...it is OUR right. I am interested in the black box, and how it will stand up to scrutiny . in authenticity . I am not for Patterson nor against.. but don't say no one is above the law. and you went above the speed limit today. and you didn't go to the PD. hypercrit
Karen M Faett
7:59 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Please leave the county mr. Douglas and jeppostol since you have no gratitute. How do either of you self righteous, cruel, petty small minded men help our county? Guess what, according to Google, neither of you have not accomplished anything in your pathetic existences. No one can say the same about Brooks. He kept us safe when he was the prosecutor and financial solvent during this latest economic downturn. How about some compassion or gratitude whether you like the man or not?
Kat Freemason
7:18 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
Safe? Financially solvent? Are you blind, Karen M. Faett? In the last 2 years the percentage of Oakland County residents getting food stamps has increased 20%. Have you noticed every other business/store front closed in Oakland County? You must not live, work or eat here.
Haulin T Male
11:01 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012
I now know that people don't read, don't understand what really happens in daily life, don't understand insurance, from the accusations, to some of the sensible replies, made here and on other Patch fillers on this subject..... (when they need to fill space, they go back to what caused the longest thread) lol. Basically it is this, what lay people think they know, and what or how it transpires or played out, is two tot. diff. ballgames .
No Fault, what part of "NO" is so hard to understand? it came about, by consent of the Ins. board, to take case load off the courts dockets, (ins.Co. figured out, at the end of the day, when all atty fees etc. pay outs are done,) just pay for all damages, further ahead.
Better watch what you wish for, those that want his Ins. to not pay for his health care, some day you might be in your own accident, where you go bankrupt over the Hosp. bills, (things have a way of coming around and biting you know where.)
I get a feeling, some of you, if there was a death, by no seat belt, would of traced THAT ticket all the way to the "ESTATE" dispersal...... as for where a person lives and freedom of speech, let it be, use it to form your likes and dislikes of what ever........ I am surprised, the editor didn't take R J's post, for no basis, and not sticking to the flavor of this interaction. Peace .......... if nothing else he has done wonders for this County, no matter what contrived flaws he has as a human.
Cathy Fucinari
1:48 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
He may have done wonders 30-40 years ago. However, the county is now in a shambles. Times have changed, and It's time for a change. Vote for Kevin Howley.
Kat Freemason
7:18 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
Insurance is provided for a fee, and is meant to cover his injuries. However, with that said, he is also collecting temporary disability insurance (mandatory for OC employees off work after 6 weeks), and that means he is NOT currently our OC Executive. His mouth pieces and underlings that get quoted in the papers are doing his job. If he IS working, and collecting disability insurance, I hope criminal charges are brought soon against him for fraud. (Anyone truly expect him to suffer consequences the rest of us do, when we know for years he hasn't?)
JohnKimble
10:20 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Kat Freemason. You appear to be confusing the Oakland County Merit Rules and/or union rules related to employee benefits with Elected Officials and/or their appointees.
Mr. Patterson, as an elected official is compensated with a salary. Look up the definition of a Salary in State and Federal Statute, or under the National Labor Relations Board.
While doing some research, next go research the County Charter and how it speaks towards compensation for elected officials.
I'm pretty confident you will find that, much like elected representatives at local Government, State Government and even at the Federal level that there is very little requirement forcing one to "accept/take" disability - or even an attendance policy at all per se'.
Do you really think Gabby Giffords was forced to double dip when she was shot in the head in Arizona a couple of years ago?
Your obvious blind hatred for the man (or perhaps his party) is causing you to ramble on with baseless statements that are to coin a phrase you seem to like on this story - fraud...
Haulin T Male
3:30 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
I believe both Gabby and brooks were working, on the job sort of speaking....... there is more fine print, for on the job type wounding........... besides Gabby has a different standard, she is not under NLRB, both are elected officials.......... don't confuse, witrh a hourly or salaried employee.......... as those that work for them,,,,,,,,,,
JohnKimble
12:22 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. Male - points are well taken.
However, Ms. Freemason's statement that "disability" is "mandatory" for "all Oakland County Employees" is baseless.
Oakland County Government has several ruling/governing statutes and policies depending on which element said employee falls under. A county elected is not subject to the merit rules, or union contracts that she may be referencing.
the gabby statement was an analogy - just as she is an elected official she is not subjected to the similar rules and regulations governing/protecting members of the House of Representatives Staffing Employees.
Haulin T Male
7:09 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Shambles? based on what....... he wasn't Co. Com, 30 or 40 yr's ago....... Oak. co. is one of the top 3 or 4 counties in the country. pretty hard to say in shambles. no need to put a political plug here....... ............
Haulin T Male
7:08 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Sorry that is richest counties.
Haulin T Male
9:16 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012
Kristen: I believe the point she was making was , Like Father Like Son ??
not sure there are seat belts on Snow mobile sleds.
Haulin T Male
12:40 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012
Oakland co."Champion of Change" White House has named 13 counties, as Counties of Change, I say this cause there are a couple of County basher's posting, unsubstantiated claims, B4 you reply to this, remember the White House is Democratic, and L Brooks Patterson and most of Oakland Co. is republican.
Haulin T Male
9:51 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
The defense atty. was in court, yesterday, with a hand full of motions, will be interesting................ he wants the text mesg. between officers under freedom of info. act