patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Democrats, Are You Voting in Today's Primary?

One of the state's high-ranking Democrats says he won't be voting in today's primary.

 

Michigan Congressman Gary Peters (D-9th District) won't be voting in today's Democratic primary election.

Neither will Farmington Hills Mayor Barry Brickner.

The two elected officials say there's no reason for them to go to the polls today, because Democrats will be choosing their candidate – President Barack Obama – in statewide caucuses on May 5. 

And even those won't offer much action. 

"There's only one person running, so it's going to be a real quickie," Brickner said.

Michigan Democratic Party officials passed a resolution earlier this month that allows Democrats to vote in the primary and at their caucuses. In the resolution, officials accused Secretary of State Ruth Johnson of "partisan mischief," confusing voters over a party rule that prohibits participation in both the primary and the caucuses. 

A spokesperson for the Michigan GOP told MLive.com there are other races going on Feb. 28, and that under state law, Johnson is required to put all presidential candidates on the ballot. Only a candidate is allowed to withdraw his or her name. 

Peters has been following the Republican primary and said for him, the "interesting storyline" is the tightening of the race between Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, given that Romney once had a "commanding" lead.

"It certainly shows his vulnerability," Peters said. "Even if Mr. Romney barely wins (in Michigan), it will certainly not bode well for him." 

He encouraged Democrats with a local election – like the contest to fill a vacant House seat in Pontiac – to vote. 

"There are some places where there are issues that we certainly hope people will turnout," Peters said, "but there are none in my voting area."

  • Are you a Democrat who will vote in today's primary?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        97 (48%)
    • No
        83 (41%)
    • I'm not sure
        22 (10%)
    Total votes: 202
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Congressman Gary Peters, Democratic Party, Democratic caucuses, Democrats, President Barack Obama, elections 2012, and participate 2012

Chad

7:59 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I will be voting for Santorum today as part of Operation Hilarity. I will do what I can to contribute to the carnival sideshow that is the Republican primary.

Reply

Chris Cross

9:04 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Cant wait to vote Peters out. The one thing I agree with Republicans on. He is dead weight to Pontiac and I must admit it is funny watching him fire his entire staff to make room for all the black people he has to hire. That is going to make a really funny before and after shot.

Reply

David Weaver

9:09 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

It's not appropriate to make a mockery of the election process. Our elections and candidates may not be perfect but it beats the alternative.

Reply

Mike

10:41 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Democrats always look for a way to disenfranchise voters.

Reply

Chad

11:31 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Disenfranchised by voting, yeah that makes sense. And the only people making a mockery of the election process are the Republican candidates. But that is their right, thus is America after all...

Reply

S

11:54 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Chad, you represent all that is wrong with the Democrats and why they were voted OUT of the House in a landslide in 2010...But you are correct, it is your right to be UNAmerican in this country, and those of us who are true to the Constitution and our founding fathers will fight for your right to be as UNPATRIOTIC as you wish. That is our fundemental difference, I support your right to be a cartoon character even if it is fundamentally wrong.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seymour Concerned

12:32 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

No American familiar with the Bill of Rights our the history of our Founding Fathers would ever support a politician wishing to erase the 1st-frigging-Amendment. So you support, Romney, right?

Chad

12:01 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Great comment! I'm unamerican because I voted! I think I know what "s" stands for...

Reply

Jerry Grady

12:28 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

It does not matter which way you vote, you all have a vote, but it is disappointing that we must vote for the weakest candidate in the republican party so the democrats can secure a win. The better question is, Didn't they already "buy" there votes when "they" saved the automakers. All taxpayers saved the automakers as we all paid and it was started with the republican party and it was moved forward because it was the right thing to do. Can't we all just stop bashing each other and support whoever is president. We were raised to Respect our Flag and our Democratic process, yet what i always read on here makes me sick.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Herb Helzer

5:53 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Correction; we're voting for Rick Santorum not to "secure a win" for the President -- I for one think he's capable of winning in November regardless of which tomato can the GOP stands up.

It's about the MARGIN of victory, and the impact on the rest of the ballot. Rick Santorum at the top of the GOP line would be devastating to dozens of House and Senate candidates in close races. It makes holding onto the Senate a possibility, andretaking the House more likely.

Comment_arrow

Anita

6:59 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

RIGHT ON! It's this partisan BS that's the problem in the first place. Doesn't seem as if any of these geniuses, be them Dem or Rep, get that point. We need to be choosing our President from the best candidates that are running. We owe it to ourselves to do this right and make the right choice for us without resorting to childish antics.

Mark Steckloff

1:24 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Jerry, at least you acknowledge, unlike Mitt, that the Federal loans actually saved the automakers.The loans also saved the supply chain, at a time when no private funding was available and the credit markets were frozen. They were a huge success, in large part because the auto workers later gave up enormous concessions, along with suppliers and other creditors. But while we all saved the auto industry through taxpayer-funded loans (which have largely been paid back ahead of schedule), it was the leadership of President Obama, over tremendous Republican opposition, including all four Republican Presidential candidates today, that pushed through this success..
And by the way, David, Mike and S -- Didn't all those Republicans cross over to vote for George Wallace, enabling him to win the 1972 Michigan Democratic primary? And what about Limbaugh's attempted Operation Chaos in 2008 to have Republicans vote in Democratic primaries?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Grady

1:49 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Mark, yes, but I won't choose sides or put any party down. It was done and followed the democratic process, so in my mind it was what America is all about, doing what is right in the long run and following the democratic process. I fault no one who didn't agree or agreed, that is what makes this country still the best it is. Lets just hope everyone starts to realize this and begins to stop the name bashing, the party bashing, the class bashing, and just respect the overall outcome. But I know I am asking for way to much.

Comment_arrow

Mike

2:17 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Mark, I vaguely remember the 1972 Election My parents "Community Organizers" before it was fashionable and were supporting George McGovern the failed Democrat candidate that year.

As for the Auto Industry: The Government was at fault of the collapse with over extension by Fannie and Freddie. Congress threatening banks to make higher risk loans. The government also had weakened the Industry by failing to have an Energy Policy, and meddling in the private sector by forcing the companies to submit to the demands of the union.

Comment_arrow

Herb Helzer

5:56 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

If everyone who SAID they voted for McGovern (from 1973 on) actually HAD voted for him, the landslide of '72 would've gone the other way.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Yoscovits

10:01 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Mark, just curious. What were the enormous concessions the autoworkers gave up? Just wondering.

Mark Steckloff

3:12 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Mike, wow, the 2008 collapse was entirely the fault of Government??! (Presumably the Bush Administration and Congress.) In fact, the bundling of sub-prime mortgages by private banks and other mortgage companies, and the sale of these toxic collateralized mortgage oligations by free-wheeling, unregulated Wall St. investment bankers was a major reason.for the crash. The bankers and rating agencies had no idea what they were selling and no clue as to the value of these unsafe debt securities, but represented them as safe and valuable nonetheless.

I am unaware of Government forcing the auto companies (or any company) "to submit to the demands of the union"' or how that contributed to the 2008 collapse. Do you have any facts to support that?

But the cause of the collapse in 2008 is a whole different discussion from the response to it by the Bush Adminstration for the first four months, which then left it for the Obama Administration.

By the way, community organizing was never "fashionable". It was basically just very hard, low-paying and thankless work trying to help those who had no one else to speak on their behalf.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike

8:51 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

If you look at the Strike against GM back when GM spun off Delphi, the Union was emboldened by the Government wanting to impose a mediator.

As for the collapse look at the advice Bush was getting from Bernanke. And the deals Chris Dodd and Barney Frank were making with Countrywide, and Freddie Mac.

Look at the Boeing Plant case in South Carolina which is being held up by the Pro Union NLRB. Or Eric Holder’s FBI attacks on Gibson Guitars (a non union employer)

There is evidence all around us of the failure of the Liberal Left, you just have to open your eyes.

Comment_arrow

Sammy V.

8:20 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Mark--- YES, the 2008 collapse was entirely the fault of the government loosening up Wall Street regulations to the point where there was no oversight.

Bush was in charge, but you could argue any congressman who voted to lessen the regulations, Alan Greenspan, the entire SEC, etc. etc.

"Regulations" seems to be a dirty word, but they are absolutely necessary.

Patch_comments_icon

Joni Hubred-Golden

3:52 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Folks, while we understand conversations become heated on these topics, please refrain from personal attacks and stick to discussing the issues. Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Reply

Brian Clark

4:17 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

If the Republicans are so unhappy about non-Republicans voting in the Republican primary, why don't the Republicans just change their process to only allow registered members of the GOP to select the nominee? Sounds pretty simple. If the Democrats had a primary like this, do you honestly think the Republicans would not take advantage?

In addition to perfectly legal albeit potentially mischievous reasons, there are plenty of other reasons people who are not fanatical Republicans might be interested in this primary. Claiming voting legally is un-American sounds un-American to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sam123

8:15 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Democrats do have open primaries, except this year when The Big O is running unopposed.

Brian Clark

4:39 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Maybe it's just payback.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/28/10529940-flashback-romney-voted-in-92-dem-primaries

"Romney's explanation at the time: 'When there was no real contest in the Republican primary, I'd vote in the Democrat primary, vote for the person who I thought would be the weakest opponent for a Republican.'"

Reply

Rickles

6:16 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Lets all remember Acorn, just one of many democratic organizations responsible for voter fraud. Democrats are petty people.

Reply

Jeffrey Long

6:36 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

It's amazing republicans always call Democrats petty for doing what they have done for years.

Reply

Mark Steckloff

6:36 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

ACORN is a poor peopl'es organization. Not a single fraudulent vote anywhere was ever shown to be cast as a result of ACORN voter registration drives or other actions. The worst problems disenfranchising voters and getting votes properly counted was when the Republican party ran its caucuses in Iowa, Nevada and Maine!

Reply

Lisa Schultz

6:41 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Republicans continue to turn away working Americans, minorities & women with their petty nit picking and wanting to take away not only basic freedoms but our freedom of and from religion. They continue to do everything but address what the American people really want answers on...jobs and the economy. Everytime our President wants to address this issue, or anything else for that matter, they have to act like children and refuse to work together, pathetic and very unpatriotic. Why I left the party and will never vote Republican again until they get their backwards priorities straight.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joni Hubred-Golden

7:45 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

A comment was removed because it violated our Terms of Use.

Reply

Tamara

11:39 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Most of you peeps are so clueless - no wonder this country is going down the tubes.
The diff between Republicans & Democrats can be summarized simply. Republicans appreciate & want to work with the founding documents that made this country great. Democrats want to take advantage of all the benefits, yet then want to destroy the whole thing. Why would anybody vote for a Democrat? To screw up families - the basis of a great society? To hand out money to people that don't need or deserve it? To make laws that go against our founding documents - such as taking away our freedom of religion one step at a time? To get out of the space program that has given us thousands of benefits in our daily lives with innovation, jobs, etc.? To get a health care system that requires Doctors let people die if their cost of care to life expectancy ratio isn't worth while (TO THEM), AND that creates huge increases in spending and hundreds of new government offices/ bigger beurocracy? Tries to leave the Bible, Christianity, faith, God out of everything, even though it is printed on our money, painted all over our buildings in D.C., is in our national motto and song, etc. and so on? 4 more years of osama and we will have such a huge defecit that China will probably be able to just take the keys to our country. I could go on, but will end inviting all people that want to ruin our country to move to Iraq where you will find what you are looking for already all set up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave W

1:10 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Tamara, you're right, the diff between the two is simple. Reps believe we should return to the good old days when women had no rights, the interstate system was only an idea, and companies could pollute and sell as many dangerous products as they wanted. Dems believe in the social safety net so that people who lose their jobs can continue to feed their families, the elderly can get the care that they need, all religions are equal in this country, and that the public should be protected from unsafe products. You have too many points so I'll only address a few...
1. How do Democrats "screw up families", by helping kids go to school/college?
2. "Hand out money", like unemployement and Social Security that people have paid into?
3. Please cite one law that has taken away your freedom of religion. There is none.
4. The reason why the Bible and Christianity are kept out of government is because of the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...". God was injected into most of the things you mentioned in the 1950s, not in 1776.
5. I think you're confused, Osama Bin Laden was killed by President Obama. Perhaps you missed that? Maybe we wouldn't be in so much debt if President Bush had done that years ago and ended the war, instead of starting a second one and spending trillions.
6. Iraq is an excellent place to go if you'd like to live in a country where the laws are based on a specific religion and women have no rights.

Comment_arrow

Dave W

1:28 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

For the record, I used to be a Republican until the party went hardcore social conservative. I, as well as plenty of Republicans I know, appreciate and advocate for fiscal conservatism while also recognizing the need for social equality and justice. My religious beliefs (and yes I do believe in God) should have no place in the government and it actually scares me when I hear people advocating for churches to have more say in the governement. Maybe it's me, but I "appreciate & want to work with the founding documents that made this country great" and keep any one religion from influencing our governement per the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

Comment_arrow

Sammy V.

8:16 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Tamara--where did you learn all this stuff? And where did you learn about the 1st Amendment, Sunday School?

Jeff Yoscovits

10:11 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Sorry dave but your hero did not kill Bin Laden. He just gave the go ahead and NOTHING more. The Navy Seals killed Bin Laden. Much better if he would have been captured alive to rot in prison without all his wives or porn!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave W

11:51 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Jeff, of course the Navy Seals are credited with the actual kill, but as Commander-in-Chief the President is the top ranked military official and he made the call. Therefore I give him and the Seals credit for the successful mission and if President Bush had succeeded in doing the same, I'd give him the same credit. Contrary to your belief, President Obama is not my hero, but as President he does have my respect.

As far as Bin Laden rotting in prison, I'd have been ok with that too because we would have him one way or another, which was the objective after 9/11. I'm not sure I understand your comments about wives and porn, considering he is without them dead. So either way, he doesn't have that any more.

Comment_arrow

Cathy Fucinari

9:22 am on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

I think giving the go ahead was more than Bush did!

Comment_arrow

Guy Fawkes

8:45 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

lol

Their party is falling apart like an old, moth eaten sweater and the best Jeff can come up with is "technically Obama didn't kill Obama."

lol Just look at it. Marvel at its simplistic failure. Revel in the surrender.

Comment_arrow

Sammy V.

8:29 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Bizarre reasoning Jeff--- and all this time I blamed George Bush for the war in Iraq, when I should have been blaming the soldiers on the ground (following orders)?????

Jan P

7:33 am on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

You tell her Dave! and Jeff, his rotting in jail does not stop his rhetoric from getting out to his followers, dead does.

Reply

Jeff Yoscovits

9:43 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Sorry Guy but Obama didn't kill Obama. If he did the country would be around a trillion dollars less in debt. If the oportunity was there I'm sure any president would give the OK. And Jan, I'm afraid his rhetoric still gets out from his successors who follow the same beliefs. BTW Guy, I'm an independent and don't follow the leader like a sheep. Don't judge me without even knowing me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sammy V.

8:29 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Jeff-- opportunities just don't present themselves. Obama restructured the war on terror to excellent results.

If John McCain were President, Osama would still be alive because as McCain told Larry King, he would not enter Pakistan to get Bin Laden... You must have missed that news story.

Jeff Yoscovits

11:12 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Yeah I know Sammy, he was over there in Pakistan clandestinely sneaking around that compound and secretly gathering all the intel to make the call to go ahead with the mission. Then was the first down the rope and up the stairs to make the kill shot on Osama. Oh btw, congrees gave bush the green light to go into Iraq. Had the wmds that most of the worlds intel agencies thought were there been found and the war went like the first Gulf war, they would have all been falling all over themselves to take credit. But when we didn't have instant success, they all bailed like rats on a sinking ship. Personnally I don't think that any of of the countries in the middle east are worth a single drop of American blood! Get the oil we have here and we can tell them all to drink theirs!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sammy V.

9:05 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Cheney and his cronies planted the stories about the WMDs and lied to everyone. the whole war was started over B.S. stories planted by Washington insiders. It's almost as if you don't realize Dick Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton before "vetting" Bush's potential V.P. running mates ("Sorry, G.W. I ain't found no one good enough to run for office with you... While, shoot, of course I'll be your V.P. candidate)". Cut to another Iraq War and BILLIONS of dollars in no-bid contracts to Halliburton and their subsidiaries and volia... Cheney's cronies are richer than ever before.

hell, they are probably the ones behind the missing billions of dollars in hard U.S. currency which periodically went missing inside of Iraq.

At least we agree no more American blood should be spilt overseas.

Jeff Yoscovits

11:25 pm on Thursday, March 8, 2012

They say that when something is repeated enough that some people start taking it as fact. Looks like you bought that story lock, stock and barrel! So they planted that story in the brains of the Clintons, several other top political leaders from both parties and many other foreign leaders? Come on, you can't be that naive. Looks like Rachel and Ed and co. are living in your mind!

Reply

Leave a comment