patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Residents Question Costs During Health Care Town Hall in Farmington Hills

State Rep. Vicki Barnett and Congressman Gary Peters talk with constituents about the Affordable Care Act.

 

Residents who attended a Monday morning town hall learned more about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and raised questions about the cost of the 2010 federal health care legislation.

State Rep. Vicki Barnett (D-Farmington Hills) and Congressman Gary Peters (D-9th Congressional) hosted the meeting at the Costick Center in Farmington Hills. Representing the Michigan Universal Health Care Action Network (MichUHCAN), a grassroots health care policy organization, Maggie Mitchell provided background about the bill, which she acknowledged "is not perfect."

She said health care "should not be a political issue. We are all going to need it. A health care system that works benefits all of us."

However, some who attended wondered whether people who are insured will end up with higher costs, as insurance companies pass on the additional cost of providing more coverage to rate-payers. Paul Goldman, a member of the Michigan Association of Health Underwriters, said penalties established for those who aren't insured are less than the cost of purchasing insurance. 

"I personally agree with the mandate, but the fines are so miniscule," Goldman said, adding he would tell his adult sons they're "better off paying the fine."

Peters said if nothing is done, "health care costs will grow at a rate that is simply unsustainable ... If we don't slow the rate of health care, we'll never get the deficit under control."

Mitchell outlined the basics of the bill, which requires insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions, extends coverage to young adults under their parents' insurance policy, provides subsidies and expands Medicaid to serve people with low incomes, and requires most who don't carry insurance to pay an annual penalty. 

For those who already have insurance, Mitchell said, "you keep what you have." Even with the Medicaid expansion and a mandate that requires most Americans to carry health insurance, about 32 million people will remain uninsured, she said.

There may be changes to the ACA, Peters said, depending on the result of a U.S. Supreme Court challenge to the mandate that requires all Americans – except people who have a religious objection, undocumented immigrants, Native Americans and people who meet certain financial criteria – to have health insurance. 

Barnett said the mandate conversation started with the insurance industry, which needs to cover healthy people in addition to sick people in order to make their companies work. The key to doing that is to encourage as many people as possible to have insurance and impose a penalty on those who don't, she said.

Peters said paying health care providers based on outcomes rather than procedures and putting a greater emphasis on disease prevention are parts of the new legislation designed to bring down costs. He said Henry Ford Health System has already begun to reward doctors based on patient outcomes.

"I have long maintained that we don't have a health care system in America, we have a sick care system," Peters said. 

"The biggest thing the ACA does, for the first time in this country, is it puts an emphasis on prevention," he added. 

Barnett said state lawmakers are taking up legislation to establish a Michigan health care exchange; Peters said nothing much will happen in Congress until the Supreme Court ruling. 

Learn more about the ACA at healthcare.gov and the Kaiser Foundation website

Related Topics: Affordable Care Act, Rep. Gary Peters, and State Rep. Vicki Barnett

bvwatson

11:55 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Mr. Goldman said that he would tell his adult sons they're "better off paying the fine."

While an underwriter must measure his success by the amount of money he can make (or save), the Congressman and the Representative must have a different metric. They must measure success by the benefit to the public interest.

I would hope that Mr. Goldman would also tell his sons that seeking their own private benefit is not the only, or the best, way to measure their choice. The cost of uninsured health care is always borne by the public at large -- by "the rest of us". So while, yes, his sons would see private benefit, they would do so at the expense of the public interest.

And isn't that what this debate on health care financing is about -- how do we provide health care for the public at large? Or do we? Should we?

In 2008, one candidate declared that access to health care is a right. The other declared it to be a privilege. The people elected the one who declared it to be a right.

That has to mean something.

Reply

warren davids

12:57 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Take a look at what is currently happening in Canada... You can not socialize a good or service and expect it to ever get better! IT WILL NOT! As for Mr. Peters, what a COWARD! He now talks about the Healthcare Act as if it were the 'be all and end all'. WHAT A HYPCRITE - he wasn't even holding town halls about this issue when he was lying about Rocky Rachkowskys record... He is the problem and so is Mr. Goldman - who will pay for your children paying the penalty! What a joke!

Reply

bvwatson

4:24 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

warren davids -- that's really a childish post. it reflects badly on your position.

Reply

Leave a comment