.

Fielding-Nair Int'l: Is "21st. c. Education" an expensive fad?

Is 21st c. education just another expensive fad?

Are we ready to turn our backs on traditional methods of education, here in the BHSD?  Is Fielding-Nair's concept of 21st Century Education a valid, credible option?

Key words:  Team Teaching and Collaborative Learning.

Is this best for our students?  What will they find when they go to college?  Will they be ready to compete on an international stage?

Are we ready to reject the concepts of individual responsibility and accountability?

I am not so sure, and I think we need to be concerned.   I am hoping to hear from students and teachers who have received information about upcoming changes to classroom management and operation, team-teaching and collaboration on the parts of students.

If you are a student or employee of the BHSD, please protect your identity, if you wish.

Fielding-Nair International, a virtual architectural consulting firm, was retained in 2009 to help create the plan to renovate a shed used for milking cows into a 10,000 sq. ft., $3-million ediface at the farm.

In October of 2010, Fielding-Nair was awarded a contract for $863,114 to "facilitate" the design/bond passage of the single high school at the Andover site.  This contract award, using money from the 2004 sinking fund, was the single offensive board action which inspired the full-board recall attempt that was initiated in 2011.

The board voted 6-0 to award the contract to FNI.   David Lubin, who enthusiastically supported this firm's proposal, did not cast a vote.

Fielding-Nair has developed a marketing term, "21st Century Education," and they use this term in presentations to school districts.  Essentially, what they propose is that technological and social changes have caused a necessary change in the education process.  Students should learn collaboratively and teachers should teach in teams.  Schools should be renovated (or re-built) to accommodate such features; and traditional classrooms are just a thing of the past.

Are they? 

Here's what I think:  Certainly, technology has changed all of our lives.  Communication, family life, occupations, retail operations, manufacturing, health care, banking, transportation, record-keeping, entertainment....have all changed, significantly, in the past 20, 30, 40, 50 years.

Our students buy their books on Amazon; not at the book store.  They often read books and materials on a computer screen instead of a hard- or soft-bound book.  That's quite a change. 

What has not changed?  Neuro-anatomy has not changed.  The process by which the human brain uptakes, comprehends, retains and recalls information has not changed.   Teaching methods may be altered, and additional technology may be useful in the classroom, but learning has not really changed. 

Recently, some teachers were informed that they would no longer have their own classrooms, and would no longer be able to decorate their own rooms with posters or materials for their studentst to study and enjoy.  Some were told that the "new" high school will be paperless, and that all materials on paper should be shredded.  Some teachers have been told that they can put educational materials in a large bag and carry it with them, to meet with students, throughout the day.

That may be very cool, and modern, but is it BETTER for our students?

Call me old-fashioned, but one-on-one, or small-group work with a very good teacher can provide the "spark" that ignites that smoldering flame that any average student needs to become a superior student.

A great teacher, who relates well to students and who cares about the future of any student can make a big difference.  A little personal attention can go a long way.

What if that great teacher is forced to work as part of a committee?

What happens to that personal attention?

The fact that the BHSD may have a high-tech "Promethian board" or personal electronic devices in every classroom does not change the fact that some students benefit from small class sizes and that some academic subjects require individual, not collective, effort to learn.

Thousands of people signed recall petitions because they did not want to spend sinking fund money on a virtual consultant, and many of those signers were very concerned about the future of education in the BHSD.  They were very worried about any educational "experiments" that might be tested on our students.

We've done it before, and the results were not good.

Is FNIs "21st c. education just another expensive fad? 

 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Ken Jackson October 31, 2012 at 12:47 PM
Ann, Second your point about collaboration. Actually have a post somewhere on this.
Mac October 31, 2012 at 12:57 PM
Intentional or accidental irony?
Mac October 31, 2012 at 01:48 PM
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent, instead of against the opponent's argument. Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy, more precisely an informal fallacy and an irrelevance."
Joan G. Berndt October 31, 2012 at 02:26 PM
Why do folks such as Ms. Greenwell insist on talking about a topic (21st century education) they know so little about? "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing." Jenny and Vic, how sad that you did not attend Yong Zhao's lecture on Monday night. While we were "in the dark" for most of his important lecture (due to the power outage) we certainly had much light shed on the important topics, (particular the testing craze and the narrowing of curriculum), of today and tomorrow in education. Let's not throw out what is good about new, but rather keep the best of traditional pedagogy and combine it with new styles of learning. Universities today expect students to be familiar with collaborative efforts in project based learning and critical thinking skills to solve problems. Our new high school will provide the best of both the old and the new, giving all students the choices they need to prepare for a successful and fulfilling future.
Amy Cardin October 31, 2012 at 05:34 PM
Ditto Joan. Our new high school facility with its flexible learning spaces will offer many more options for all students. Collaborative learning will not be the exclusive way our education is delivered, but at least we will have the option and the space when needed.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »